For more than an hour of the meeting I attended February 6 at Poggio Mirteto entitled: "WHAT FUTURE FOR THE LOW SABINA , is possible to build a development model that combines work, quality of life, promotion and defense of local products and cultural heritage and environmental "
and listened with all attention possible, didactic educational interventions that have followed. I could not last long because the arguments were a bit 'trite and tone Communication was truly 'the simple people of our village.' But ultimately like to disagree with what they said? But then why I felt a deep sense of annoyance ever since I read the manifesto of the initiative?
try to explain in brief.
Everything would have been acceptable if he had not brought the number of the PD (Democratic Party). None of the speakers is it started with a critical view of the actions of government of Lower Sabine, almost all driving PD. Without exceeding the critical landscape Sabine is still valuable and so do not cry shame on what happened, but it is equally true that while there has been no planning for the protection and enhancement of the unique characteristics of the Sabine territory, and then to create the conditions for 'a development model that combines work ...' the only projects developed and implemented by local government-led PD going in the opposite direction. In fact, just to name a few, the towns of Montopoli, Fara and Castelnuovo di Farfa are chewy, as opposed to the creation of a protected area on the river Farfa, while benefiting from substantial public funding, the municipality of Poggio Mirteto continues to disseminate its territory of urbanization and industrial areas, craft, and the town of Torrita Tiber river ports and raves about rural villages, (see the post Bricks Sabine), and then you do not understand what they are talking about our speakers there. It 'true that you have to give all the responsibilities to local governments and citizens must be Armijo of tools to verify, check for and oppose the action of their rulers and that is precisely what the associations local, cultural and environmental organizations, are trying to do and that is why were not called to participate in the debate. Moreover, the activities of the associations are characterized by uncertain outcomes because it was missing the wealth of cultures, knowledge and identity of a territory lived 'collectively'. Every 'good' politician launched the message, not really new, that addressing the political and administrators could solve its own very special problems. The last time real collective identity and effective in this area took place during the struggles against the sharecropping. Since the end of those fights, as a result of the interventions of the Bank patronage for the South to create the industrial area of \u200b\u200bRieti, never developed a way of seeing the future of the territory of Sabina which all who live. And so for the Lower Sabine. Most of the landscape we observe today has become a place devoid of meaning. Where you do not plan the future of the community and where they can, then, to imagine and implement a wide variety of projects that benefit the individual or the few, very few families. In a word, the old cronyism that characterized the fascist Italy, where, for reasons even vital, it was essential to ingratiate himself with the power and is continued with the Christian Democrats and came to us with all the political, with very few exceptions. Meanwhile, the needs have changed but the substance remained the same relations between local politicians and citizens. The Sabine territory, then it is no longer imagined as a place to draft a collective future is to become 'prey subjectively'. In this instance the Democratic Party, the local expressions of this party, have opposed any alternative project. The postwar models of development are implemented with 60 years too late: the economy related to public works (including the so-called environmentally relevant become the new target of consumption and waste land), construction quality without (as indeed in all Lazio), mining activity, the infrastructure works, often heavily influenced by the needs of the city of Rome and in this sense defined modern. With no real consensus of the community which is only touted the lure of a job, the local politicians are trying desperately, and to the detriment of the common heritage of the area and, for accreditation with the control of national economic power. And this is how we explain the development of the logistics hub of the project Step Corese industrial development of the Consortium of Rieti, which despite being a public body does not enjoy any economic transparency. Project details are not public. Fed to the citizen-voters are thrown, 1000th most jobs. So just like in the Middle Ages they hurled the remains of the banquet from the castle walls to the starving populace. Without any real feedback to the project but has benefited from important facilities in terms of procedures and substantial public funding as established by a public body (the Consortium) and looks set to benefit private companies and not only of the local economy. The Sabine territory, as was already mentioned in the industrial core of Rieti, is intended to give the workforce (if not qualified, better) and nothing else. Yet our politicians should learn from their experience of the past that there can be no industrialization producing economic benefits in the territories that have never had any vocation, where there are no suitable professional, or road networks and communication networks nor immaterial. In short, why start from scratch with a huge financial investment and improve public, encourage, promote excellence in real geographical area. I fear that these phenomena are governed inculturation of a ruling class and business models that repeats endlessly productive economic losers and outdated. Moreover in our territory there is no trace of entrepreneurship to high scientific and technological content and low environmental impact, nor territorial systems (either in agriculture or in the trade or services), enhanced services (cultural, social, educational), nor attention to the so-called green economy.
Not a hint of a modern waste management, few initiatives on alternative energy sources without further havoc in the territory, superficiality in the treatment and the pattern of city centers without the need for unnecessary, expensive and invasive. In short, a culture reigns economic, political and social typically depressed area in order to perpetuate the lack of development and firmly and tightly control the electoral consensus. I will not dwell on these tests which are now heritage of social research and socio-political, but in this context, are part of all operations and projects still unrealized.
And then who are the people who wanted to explain the need for a different development for the Lower Sabine? People of good will and good culture that have nothing to do with the politics of PD Sabine (the province of Rieti and Rome) and the government led by the party, packed and secretly supported (see Ponzano Romano). I dare say that this is an election made perhaps unbeknownst to the guests. However, expect to be denied and to see at least part of local politicians of the Democratic Party to head a new Renaissance Sabino.
Eh! eh! eh! : Sorry but I laugh.
Luciano Blasco
0 comments:
Post a Comment